FANCY LIVING
MAGAZINE
Not in the
mood for reading political editorials and news debates? Do you want to get
lost in fantasies, luxury, outrageous escapades, beauty and
sophistication? Visit
FANCY LIVING
MAGAZINE

|
INTERNATIONAL EXHIBITION
Review of Nicolas
Schöffer Exhibition at Espace EDF Electra
6, rue Recamier 75007 Paris
Tel: 01 53 63 23 45
By
Dr. Joseph Nechvatal, World Jewish News Agency Senior Art Critic and
Historian.
Photo: Nicolas Schöffer, Cybernetic Sculptor, Paris,
France. 1912-1992.
If one discounts the existence of László Moholy-Nagy’s Bauhaus Light
Space Modulator (1923-30) (rebuilt in 1970 and now in the collection of
Harvard University's Busch-Reisinger Museum) – a visionary multimedia
artwork that helped inaugurate the artistic dialogue between machines,
light, shadow and motion - there is something to the claim that the
Hungarian-born French artist Nicolas Schöffer (1912-1992) is 'the Father
of Cybernetic Art'. At the very least this premise may now be entertained
while viewing actual work (mostly mobile sculpture under theatrical
lighting effects) and an incredible amount of documentation now on view in
Paris at the museum of the French electricity company Espace EDF Electra.

What
is immediately evident in this exceptional historic presentation is that
Schöffer’s career touched on painting, kinetic sculpture, architecture,
urbanism, film, TV, and even music (he collaborated with Pierre Henry) – all
in the pursuit of a dynamism in art which was originally initiated by the
Cubo-Futurists and then intensified and solidified by the Russian
Constructivists such as Naum Gabo, Anton Pevsner, Moholy-Nagy and Ludwig
Hirschfeld-Mack. All were concerned with opening up the static
three-dimensional sculptural form to a fourth dimension of time and motion,
and this was Schöffer’s intention as well. Schöffer however, coming well
after, benefited pleasingly from cybernetic theories (theories of feedback
systems (interactivity) primarily based on the ideas of Norbert Wiener
(1894-1964)) in that they suggested to him artistic processes in terms of
the organization of the system manifesting it (e.g., the circular causality
of feedback-loops). For Schöffer, this enabled cybernetics to elucidate
complex artistic relationships from within the work itself.
His
CYSP 1, from 1956, is considered the first cybernetic sculpture in art
history in that it made use of electronic computations as developed by the
Philips Company. The sculpture is set on a base mounted on four rollers,
which contains the mechanism and the electronic brain. The plates are
operated by small motors located under their axis. Photo-electric cells and
a microphone built into the sculpture catch all the variations in the fields
of color, light intensity and sound intensity. All these changes occasion
reactions on the part of the sculpture. Consequently Schöffer’s kinetic
sculptural compositions were able to parallel Warren McCulloch's adaptation
of cybernetics in formulating a creative epistemology concerned with the
self-communication within an observer's psyche and between the psyche and
the surrounding environment. This is cybernetics’ primary usefulness in
studying the supposed subject/object polarity in terms of artistic
experience. That is the theoretical premise, at least.

Photo: NICOLAS SCHÖFFER, Cysp 1 au festival Avant-garde,
Marseille, 1956
(catalogue Electra - Musée d'Art Moderne de la Ville de Paris).
In actuality we are treated here to dramatic light shows
(some on the trippy side) that come whirling out of his spinning mechanical
metal sculptures. Colored lights bounce off revolving polished metal towers
- casting ever-changing lights and shadows onto huge wall screens and into
our eyes. There also is a very basic interactive room consisting of a group
of smaller whirling sculptures which respond to the presence of a viewer and
a large prismatic triangle structure containing infinity views. This work
brought to mind Lucas Samaras, Room 2 and other mirrored immersive works
such as Getulio Alvani’s Cubic Environment and Luc Peire's Environment – all
of which similarly offered the viewer a pervasive reflective arrangement
where mirrored surfaces rebound amplitude to an indefinite degree.
In Schöffer’s triangular structure, my image was being ceaselessly mixed and
reflected within spinning lights as I was made to feel an integral part of
an exploding expanse. In general, this infinity experience bided me to view
myself in infinity and so to feel space not in the traditional passive
Euclidean custom - but in a conceptually operative and viractual (viractive)
manner. In addition, the exhibition demonstrates Schöffer’s three period
styles. First is his “spatio-dynamic” constructions from 1948 on: attempts
at a synthesis of spatial and dynamic elements. Next come the “lumo-dynamic”
constructions of 1957, which connect light projections to music. In his
“chrono-dynamic” works of 1959, word and tone, movement and space, light and
color form together a totality of space-time. Also well documented is
Schöffer’s 52 metres high “Cybernetic Tower” from 1961, which was
constructed in Liege with 66 revolving mirrors. Given the period-piece
nature of the exhibition, I found it stylistically engaging - and not overly
retro looking. Indeed, the show surprisingly did not appear that dated, even
though of course it recalled the early Paris 60’s and the futuristic 'space
age' designs of Paco Rabanne which involved the use of moving metallic discs
or plates. Yet my subject/object polarity never shifted much. But given
that, shouldn’t Nicolas Schöffer work be considered something other than an
art object per se? Perhaps it is more appropriate to think of it as a means
of transforming static perspective vision into a luminous motion study. We
might just as well consider it then as stage props. Or better, an apparatus
for painting with light. With his video works of 1961, Schöffer is
additionally regarded as an early representative of video art – so perhaps
it all funnels into special effects broadcast TV (which he did).
For me, the final interest of this show (which I have seen three times now)
is in its allowing me to better position Schöffer in a certain art-tech
artist engineer intellectual history – a living history which has not yet
exhausted itself. Indeed it is touching to consider that László Moholy-Nagy’s
Light Space Modulator – which was driven by a motor and equipped with 128
electric bulbs in different colors - was finally demonstrated at the 1930
Paris Werkbund exhibition. So we see Nicolas Schöffer here not only as a
pioneer of cybernetic art, kinetic sculptor, town planner, architect and
theoretician of art - but as a
key player in the middle of the art-tech intellectual narration – a
narration which increasingly defines artistic achievement in the beginning
of the 21st century.
|
_SPACE FOR PRIME
ADVERTISEMENT__
Advertise your products in this column.
CONTACT US:
WORLD
JEWISH NEWS AGENCY: VOICE OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE AROUND THE WORLD
REACHING
2,250.000 READERS AROUND THE GLOBE

FOUNDED, JUNE 2005
|