COLUMN OF DAVID BEDEIN: POLITICAL WISDOM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REACHING
2,250.000 READERS AROUND THE GLOBE
|
|
|
|
American citizens often ask what they can do for Israel
when they are in touch with their Congressional representatives.
Perhaps the most important thing they can do is to challenge the Ten
Principles of The U.S. State Department’s 2005 Middle East agenda,
which includes:1-The cutting of Israel in half by advocating that the
proposed PLO entity be “contiguous” in the words of Secretary
Condoleeza Rice from Gaza to Bethlehem. 2 -Ignoring the PLO’s
decision not to annul the PLO covenant, which mandates that the PLO
continue its state of war against Israel. This covenant continues
despite a firm American commitment not to deal with the PLO until it
cancels the covenant. 3-Financing a Palestinian school system that
operates the first curriculum since the Third Reich that teaches
children to make war against Jews. (Review the Palestinian curriculum
at www.edume.org) 4 -Allowing PLO
leadership to order the murder of Palestinian dissidents. A total of
51 Arabs are currently facing death for the “crime” of cooperating
with Israel. The State Department has said it will not intervene to
stop this practice. 5-Vetoing Israel’s right to build homes or
synagogues in the Jewish Quarter of the Old City of Jerusalem. The
State Department’s answer as to whether the repair of the Hurva
Synagogue in the Jewish Quarter would represent an act of “illegal
settlement activity” was “yes.” 6 -Rejecting the idea that Jerusalem
is even part of Israel. Most recently, President Bush, on the advice
of the State Department, vetoed a bill that would require U.S.
documents issued in Jerusalem to list “Jerusalem, Israel,” as their
point of origin. Currently all such documents are listed as
“Jerusalem,” with no country mentioned. They include U.S. passports
and birth certificates issued for American citizens who dwell or were
born in the western sector Jerusalem. 7-Nurturing Muhammad Dahlan, as
coordinator of PLO security forces, despite the fact that Dahlan has
taken credit for planning the murders of hundreds of Jews (See Israeli
Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s article in the Wall Street Journal
of June 3, 2002, documenting Dahlan’s murder record and calling for
his elimination). 8-Ordering renewal of CIA training for the PLO
security forces, despite the fact that these same PLO forces have used
the CIA training they received in the 1990’s to murder Jews since the
September 2000 inception of organized terror warfare against Israel.
9-Continuing to fund the “right of return” campaign of the UNRWA |
ONE PLACE LEFT IN THE WORLD WHERE THERE ARE NO HUMAN RIGHTS FOR JEWS
One morning last week, I came to my office at the press
center in Jerusalem at 9:45am and was greeted with two new dissonant
realities within minutes.
An official letter from the Israel Government
Lands Authority authorizing our family's purchase of a home in the city
of Efrat. Efrat is 14 kilometers south of Jerusalem, a city of almost
1,800 families, set to expand to 5,000 families according to the
municipal plans that were approved by the government of Israel more than
a quarter-century ago. After twenty
years of rental, we finally own our home. Well, there was not much time
for the sentimentality of owning a home in the state of Israel. In other words, the only place in the world where Jews have no de jure human rights and civil liberties would be in Judea, Samaria and Gaza This is not the first time that I have heard such a notion. On July 23rd, 1990, our news agency organized a dialogue between Israeli-American residents of Judea and the US Consul in Jerusalem, Mr. Phillip Wilcox. During that discussion, the guests from Judea noted the sensitivity of the US government to the human rights and civil liberties of Palestinian Arab residents of Judea, Samaria and Gaza. They asked the US consul about the human rights of Jews who live in the same areas - given the traditional sensitivity of the US government to human rights and civil liberties in this part of the world.
US Consul Wilcox responded quickly and
straightforwardly, and with no emotion: "If you live where you live,
you have no human rights and no civil liberties."
The US consul invoked the 1949 Fourth
Geneva Convention, which forbids nations that conquer other lands in
war to settle their citizens in those lands. Wilcox, consistent with
this position, now heads the Washington-based Foundation for Middle
East Peace, which has as its purpose the eradication of Jewish
communities in Judea, Samaria, Gaza, the Golan and even in the new
neighborhoods in Jerusalem that were established by Israel since 1967.
Wilcox's statement ignored the fact that
the San Remo Treaty had been adopted by both the League of Nations and
by the United Nations. That treaty protected the right of Jews to
purchase land and to settle in the Jewish National Homeland, defined
as anywhere west of the Jordan River. Indeed, the man who had spearheaded the "territories for peace" ideology, the late former army intelligence chief Aharon Yariv, told me that the difference between his view, coined in 1974 as the Yariv-Shem Tov peace formula, and the attitude of the New Left today was that the Yariv-Shem Tov formula mandated "territories for peace" and not "territories before peace". And Yariv warned that ceding territory without a peace agreement would run the risk of an enemy using that territory as a forward position to attack.
How can a key PM appointee maintain a
business stake in the Palestinian economy?
|